Hot Topics
Why U.S. Manufacturing Is Making a Comeback: After decades of chasing low-cost labor overseas, American manufacturers are rethinking their strategy. In 2025, reshoring, bringing production back to the U.S., is a growing movement driven by economic, political, and technological shifts. From Fortune 500 companies to small and mid-sized manufacturers, businesses are rediscovering the value of making things at home. Primary factors fueling the reshoring trend are as follows:
A More Resilient Supply Chain – The COVID-19 pandemic exposed deep vulnerabilities in global supply chains. Port congestion, factory shutdowns overseas, and raw material shortages forced companies to reevaluate their logistics strategies. Domestic production offers speed, predictability, and flexibility. Also, in response to rising tariffs on imports from China and the European Union, companies are looking to reduce exposure to foreign trade policies.
Technology is Closing the Cost Gap – Advanced manufacturing technologies, including automation, robotics, AI, and data analytics, are reducing the need for large labor forces while increasing precision and productivity. These innovations are helping U.S. manufacturers compete with low-cost countries by doing more with less.
Consumer and Corporate Pressure – Reshoring isn’t driven by cost and logistics alone. More consumers are intentionally choosing products labeled “Made in the USA,” associating them with higher quality, ethical labor practices, and sustainability. Corporations are also prioritizing domestic production as part of their strategies. For many brands, reshoring is as much a reputational decision as it is an operational one.
Even though U.S. labor costs remain higher than many overseas alternatives, more businesses are looking at the total cost of ownership (TCO). TCO includes not only wages, but also: shipping and freight costs, tariffs and import duties, inventory carrying costs, risk of supply disruption, corporate reputation, and other considerations. For many companies, reshoring is becoming a strategic move that balances financial, operational, and brand-related priorities.
Although reshoring offers clear benefits, it isn’t without complexity. To make it work, companies must overcome several hurdles, including a significant skills gap, significant upfront investment costs, operational efficiency and cost pressures, and the realignment of suppliers and logistics. With that in mind, many businesses are starting small by relocating a single product line, dual-sourcing critical components, or piloting domestic production.
Reshoring is no longer just a reactive strategy, it’s a proactive step toward greater resilience, control, and long-term value. As economic and political landscapes continue to shift, more companies are realizing that the cheapest option isn’t always the smartest one. Manufacturing in America is back on the radar and may just be here to stay.
Caterpillar Pledges $100 Million to Upskill Workforce: Caterpillar Inc. plans to commit $100 million over the next five years to upskill its workers to keep up with technological advancements and an evolving labor market. The construction and mining equipment manufacturer is investing an effort to train up its workforce with robotics, automation, and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, including digital twins and machine language models.
The pledge builds on Caterpillar’s efforts to close the growing manufacturing skills gap. Over the next five years, the skill sets needed for the global workforce are set to evolve dramatically, driven by rapid technological advancements in AI, information processing, robotics, and automation. According to the World Economic Forum’s The Future of Jobs Report 2025, these trends are expected to fuel demand for technology-related skills, including in AI and big data, networks and cybersecurity, and technological literacy. There will also be a need for more human-centered skills, such as leadership and social influence.
According to the report, workers on average can expect two-fifths of their existing skills to be transformed or outdated by 2030. This is not only a labor issue, but a barrier for businesses looking to remain competitive in a dynamic market. Recently, companies like Amazon and Siemens have looked to combat this through sizable investments in upskilling their workers as a recruitment and retention strategy.
“As an industry leader, Caterpillar understands the urgency of preparing the next generation with the capabilities required for the jobs of tomorrow,” said Jaime Mineart, Caterpillar’s chief technology officer. “This pledge, our first of its kind, reflects our dedication to collaborating with our global stakeholders to devise the best training solutions.”
U.S. Manufacturing Stalls as Tariffs Create Uncertainty: Manufacturing industry performance contracted in March, as companies struggled with the uncertainty surrounding the Trump administration’s tariff policy. After seeing modest gains in production and demand in February, the Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) Purchasing Managers’ Index registered 49% in March, down 1.3 percentage points from the previous month. A reading above 50.0% signals an industry in economic growth.
New orders decreased in March as suppliers and customers faced disagreements over which party would pay for tariff-driven price hikes, and uncertainty over near-term demand. ISM’s new orders index dropped 3.4 percentage points, down to 45.2%. According to Timothy Fiore, chair of the ISM’s manufacturing business survey committee, manufacturers’ uncertainty regarding tariff policies and their impact “overshadowed” anything else in ISM survey respondents’ comments. “The manufacturing economy is struggling, primarily due to the tariff uncertainty,” Fiore said.
“A key concern among manufacturers is the degree to which heightened uncertainty resulting from government policy changes, notably in relation to tariffs, causes customers to cancel or delay spending, and the extent to which costs are rising and supply chains deteriorating in this environment,” said Chris Williamson, chief business economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence. According to S&P Global, prices rose in March, driven in part by tariffs on steel and aluminum. Price inflation related to the cost of materials and labor used in manufacturing production rose to its highest level since August 2022.
While tariffs on their own are not inflationary, their impact is likely to raise the cost of living in the U.S., which could drive more workers to demand wage increases, Fiore said. The president has repeatedly touted tariffs as a way to grow domestic manufacturing, driving more companies to invest in U.S. production as a way to avoid import cost hikes. Although this is possible, Fiore said domestic manufacturers are likely to raise their prices to match the heightened cost environment sparked by tariffs, meaning that even if the U.S. industry grows, it isn’t likely to lead to cheaper consumer goods. In the end, we’re looking at raising the cost of living in the U.S. consistent with tariffs imposed across all of our imported products, which, in turn, is going to drive up the cost of domestic products.
Signs of Recovery Seen in Demand for Machine Tools: U.S. machine shops and other manufacturers increased their capital investments to $389.9 million during February 2025, up 9.9% from January and 12.5% from February 2024. According to a report issued by the Association of Manufacturing Technology (AMT), the two-month total for manufacturing technology orders was $744.74 million, 8.8% higher than the January-February 2024 total. “In addition to the uptick in the value of machinery ordered, unit sales have rebounded in 2025. For much of 2024, growth in the number of units sold lagged the increase in the total value of orders. That trend has reversed in 2025,” according to AMT.
In particular, AMT noted improved results in the value of orders from contract machine shops, the largest buying segment for manufacturing technology. February orders for those operations were up nearly 25% from January. In contrast, AMT reported that aerospace manufacturers’ orders decreased sharply from January to February, although the number of units ordered rose slightly. Between those two readings, AMT observed that manufacturers of electrical equipment nearly doubled the number of machines ordered during February, and yet the total value of their orders was about even with January’s result.
Whether the trend reversal AMT identified in the February data signals a long-anticipated, sustained recovery in demand is difficult to determine. AMT offered two alternative perspectives on the impact that widespread tariffs on imported products may have on demand for new machines: that lowered stock valuations by businesses may reduce corporate earnings, and thus weaken business and consumer confidence; or, that businesses may choose to invest in new technology, to recover the profitability that may be lost due to reduced valuations.
Intel Looks to Slash Expenses: Intel, one of the world’s largest semiconductor chip manufacturers, plans to cut an unspecified number of workers as it looks to flatten its organizational structure and shift to an engineer-focused culture built on leaner teams. The moves are part of a corporate overhaul ignited by Lip-Bu Tan, the new CEO, to cut costs, including lowering its operational spending forecast by half a billion dollars: down to $17 billion this year and $16 billion in 2026.
Tan stressed the need to revamp Intel’s culture. “We are seen as too slow, too complex, and too set in our ways, and we need to change”. He vowed to take bold actions, including a flatter executive team, greater empowerment of the company’s engineers, streamlining teams, cutting back on meetings, and reducing the number of people attending. Tan also called for a return-to-work policy in which some employees who currently spend three days per week on site would be required to spend four days on site, beginning September 1.
Media reports in recent days have suggested Intel could lay off more than 20% of its workforce, which numbered about 109,000 employees at the end of last year, including 12,000 in and around Chandler, Arizona. The semiconductor giant lost $18.8 billion in 2024 amid a weakening performance, and another $821 million in the first quarter of 2025. In addition, the company recently lowered its second quarter guidance amid “fluid” trade policies and the probability of a recession growing. Intel, like many other manufacturers, is hedging its bets when it comes to the negative impact of prolonged tariffs.
Manufacturing Industry Outlook and Performance
U.S. manufacturing contracted in March after growing for two straight months, amid rising anxiety over tariffs on imported goods and fears of a recession. The results of a recent survey conducted by ISM offered a gloomy assessment of business conditions, with tariffs cited as a major factor by manufacturers, as the President’s tariffs have eroded business and consumer confidence.
Tepid consumer spending has heightened concerns for lackluster economic growth and higher inflation. U.S. manufacturers have said that uncertainty from tariffs is negatively impacting business planning and sales. The back-and-forth in tariff headlines and increasing uncertainty make it nearly impossible to plan anything accurately in both the short and long term. Manufacturers understandably want the tariff uncertainty to end as soon as possible. In the meantime, they are ringing the alarm bells for a coming recession and begging the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates.
The ISM said its manufacturing PMI dropped to 49.0% in March from 50.3% in February. A PMI reading below 50% indicates contraction in the manufacturing sector, which accounts for 10.2% of the economy. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast the PMI would slip to 49.5%. Manufacturing started turning around at the beginning of the year after a lengthy recession triggered by the U.S. central bank’s aggressive interest rate hikes in 2022 and 2023 to tame inflation. Unfortunately, the emerging recovery appears to have been snuffed out by Trump’s tariffs. Nonetheless, it is still early in the game and remains to be seen how President Trump’s tariff policies will play out.